|
The Legal Geylang (prostitute) Scene Had a great time with a government approved broad in Geylang? Tell us all about it! No FREELANCE crap here please. Legal commercial sex only. Threads about illegal Geylang whores carry a reputation point penalty. |
|
|
Thread Tools |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
1807
Could not find a thread on 1807, so decided to start one now...
L18 H07 - 68413441 (2.30pm - 2.30am)is run by an old husband n wife team, who r quite friendly...abt 5-6 rooms...rooms appear to be quite clean n wif mirrors... At the moment 1807 only has 1 GL150 mm...goes by the name of Ling Ling...more on her in the following posts... |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Ling Ling(1807)
First off a v big tku to Defunct n Nat28 for their earlier frs on this chiobu newbie Ling Ling(1807)...this is what i call geuine no agenda sharing which i fully support...generally agree wif their frs on this Ling Ling...i am taking the liberty of repasting their frs in this thread...for completeness i am also including the latest fr on her by Federer801, which appears to reinforce that old chestnut, different strokes for different folks, tks for keeping it real mate!
I shall pen my own fr on Ling Ling in due course...but let me just say for now that this quite fair, demure, feminine chio Xi'an, Shaanxi mm provided me wif vgd sex svc n super duper deliciously high gfe!!...power to the max natural gf feeling...v sensuous n passionate, plus natural, spontaneous, submissive, soft spoken n oh so 温柔 !!...Ling Ling also seems to enjoy sex, both foreplay n being fucked!!... one of the best natural gf fucks tat i hv had wif a chiobu gl150 mm in a long time!!...also gd company...this Ling Ling is a keeper in me book, definite gem |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Ling Ling (1807)
Defunct's first fr on Ling Ling
Quote:
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Ling Ling(1807)
Nat28's fr on Ling Ling
Quote:
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Ling Ling (1807)
Federer801's fr on Ling Ling
Quote:
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Ling Ling(1807)
Defunct's 2nd fr on Ling Ling
Quote:
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
Am curious ...
Juz by looking at the FRs written so far, there seem to be a lot of variations in the ratings of the various departments ... Despite the fact that we have to bear in mind that all these are rather subjective and also the element of human factor might affect the ratings of the punters and the performance of the WL concern, I hope to see more bona fide samsters posting FR/comments on this newbie to subside my curiosity as well as "others" ... No offense intended ... Well, juz my personal perception ...
Juz curious, MaXx
__________________
There's a dark side to male sexuality that operates on an intrinsically primitive level. Unleash it and you can't help but see evidence of raw, uncontrollable emotion ... My Personal FR Thread: ( Click to show/hide )
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
I too am very curious as well...
Oh my...i too am also v curious as well...but my curiosity is more related as to who are to be considered "more bona fide samsters"...and who decides who are "more bona fide samsters"??....
Oh yes n as for those purported "others" ... cum cum now...surely u hv voices of yr own instead of having to rely on an ostensible spokesman?.... No offense intended as well... |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
You sounded uptight & defensive ...
Oh well, we are all entitled to our own opinion ... each and everyone of us is free to comment since this is a public forum ... Your aggressive promo effort may not be in vain should the WL lives up to what were being posted here, do you agree? Hence, don't need to sound overly defensive and uptight...
In addition, I am sure those who are slightly more observant would ask the same question considering the significant variations in the above FR ratings ... and, I believe this is a valid general question ... Am curious as to why you are so uptight about it ... Very strange indeed, MaXx
__________________
There's a dark side to male sexuality that operates on an intrinsically primitive level. Unleash it and you can't help but see evidence of raw, uncontrollable emotion ... My Personal FR Thread: ( Click to show/hide )
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Pot Calling The Kettle Black
Oh my....someone being so self-righteous....as usual i sld add!...
"overly defensive"..."uptight"...??...this cumming fm a person who has to resort to bold highlights and has the cheek to allude to "bona fide samsters"?!... as for"aggressive promo effort"...goodness gracious me...that is rich...cumming fm you of all people...a person who repeatedly promotes his apparent fav mms in this forum...even to the point of aggressively promoting in bold highlights(i sld add) that one of his current fav mm's fake enhanced boobs has supposedly turned into a more soft and natural feel?!..... pot calling the kettle black.... |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
Your action is very strange indeed ... Hmmm ...
Oh My goodness, this is indeed very strange ... I was merely asking a valid question re the significant variance of the FRs posted here and I did not even mention name(s) ... and yet you intercepted "recklessly" albeit the FRs in question were not even written by you ... Your action is tantamount to being guilty conscience ... The primary difference between you and I re this particular episode is, I embrace criticisms/comments be it good or bad ... Well, since you have brought it up here ... That subject on Man Man's tits is a pertinent example that I embrace criticism and comment ... I didn't counter or stop you from making comments about her tits, did I? How I felt about her tits are entirely my personal opinion ... I accept the fact you and others may have an opposite opinion versus mine ...
OMG, MaXx
__________________
There's a dark side to male sexuality that operates on an intrinsically primitive level. Unleash it and you can't help but see evidence of raw, uncontrollable emotion ... My Personal FR Thread: ( Click to show/hide )
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Pot Calling The Kettle Black II
Oh my...still on the deluded self-righteous path i see...
I fail to see how my abv posts r in any way "reckless" nor as to why i sld purportedly hv a "guilty conscience"...in fact the reverse is v much apparent, pointing straight back in yr direction.... as for" embracing criticisms/comments be it good or bad re this particular episode"...the fact that i disclosed all current frs on this Ling Ling, speaks for itself... as for Man Man(16W06) n her fake enhanced boobs...the fact of the matter is that you cannot deny yr repeated aggressive promo of her n the supposed recent soft n natural feel of her fake enhanced boobs in this forum... |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Am curious ...
Quote:
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
Facts Do Not Lie ...
This is getting strange and funny at the sametime as I probe further ... Facts do not lie ... Let me summarizes here ...
1) It is a fact that there is significance variations in the above FR ratings. Need more bona fide samsters to verify. I believe this is a valid and reasonable query on all discerning samsters mind. 2) It is a fact that Omnia's action appeared to be defensive, uptight and feeling guilty conscience even though the FRs in question were not even written by him and yet he intercepted my query. In addition, I did not even mention his nick in my very first post. This is rather pecculiar to me. 3) The primary difference between Omnia and me re this episode is - Unlike Omnia, I embrace criticism and/or comments be it bad or good one. The issues on Man Man's tits (@another thread) and Ling Ling (in this thread) are pertinent examples. The ïdiom - "Ä pot calling a Kettle black" does not sustain here. 4) It is a fact that promotion of WL aggressively or mildly is a form of agenda albeit it may be a good form of agenda as it helps to drive the WL's business & to help fellow samsters as to which WL to bonk ... Honestly I myself also have this intent to help the WLs and to create awareness that such a WL does exist in GL ... However, Omnia's advocation of "Genuine Sharing & No Agenda" contradicts his action here ... He certainly make himself looks better if he stops telling the whole SBF community about this mantra of his since he himself wanna promote WLs ... BTW, Omnia setup a thread specifically to promote Ling Ling ... If that is not enough, he tried to capitalize on Nato's unqiue preference for certain type of women to indirectly sell Ling Ling ... Of course this is his prerogative to do so ... What I am trying to impress upon others is, this is also a form of agenda! 5) It is a fact that Omnia could not accept negative remark against the WLs or query the WLs whom he promotes and/or promoted. Again, "Ä pot calling a Kettle black" does not sustain here. 6) It is a fact that Omnia did not receive satisfactory service from Man Man when he bonked the latter the very first time whilst others gotten above-average service from her. (Refer to his FR on Man Man if you're keen) Is he still feeling sore till now?? It appears to me that he is looking for good opportunity to "bite" back at Man Man ... I am afraid there is more to it than meet the eyes ... MaXx
__________________
There's a dark side to male sexuality that operates on an intrinsically primitive level. Unleash it and you can't help but see evidence of raw, uncontrollable emotion ... My Personal FR Thread: ( Click to show/hide )
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Am curious ...
You can call me names but make sure you substantiate your statement with sufficient grounds before I label you as another troll ...
__________________
There's a dark side to male sexuality that operates on an intrinsically primitive level. Unleash it and you can't help but see evidence of raw, uncontrollable emotion ... My Personal FR Thread: ( Click to show/hide )
|
Advert Space Available |
Bookmarks |
|
|