Is it "self-gain" or "common good" comes first?

[Sammyboy RSS Feed]

An honorable member of the Coffee Shop Has Just Posted the Following:



We often see opposition members appearing to be working together for the common good of Singaporean but is it really? There are rumours flying around which I am beginning to question.

We used to see M.Ravi fighting for opposition members whenever they get into trouble and I assumed he did it pro-bono or charge a minimal sum. Then during the Hougang by-election, he got a cleaner to challenge the Constitution on the by-election. They asked for donation to fight the case and they were given an undisclosed amount by the public. When the case was over, the court decided that no cost to be paid to the court but there were rumour that he charged the cleaner for the work done. I mean he actually charge a cleaner whom I guess would have no interest in whether there is a by-election or not in the first place.

https://sg.news.yahoo.com/hougang-re...gal-costs.html

Ravi also represented the foreign workers involved in the Little India riots but now he suddenly make public that he is discharging himself. Why? http://mypaper.sg/top-stories/lawyer...cases-20140624

Now there is the Roy's case against PM coming up. Then again, Roy asked for public funding which he got more than $80,000. Now there is rumour spreading within the inner circle involved in the case that that Ravi is charging Roy a hefty sum for case. I dunno how true is this though.

Is M.Ravi milking the situation since there is public support?


Click here to view the whole thread at www.sammyboy.com.