|
The Legal Geylang (prostitute) Scene Had a great time with a government approved broad in Geylang? Tell us all about it! No FREELANCE crap here please. Legal commercial sex only. Threads about illegal Geylang whores carry a reputation point penalty. |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|||
Re: Girls in 1654A
Tried Qi Qi a few weeks back, looks are above avg, boobs about a C augmented. Service just average, not really my cup of tea.
|
|
|||
Re: Girls in 1654A
Can I please ask from our dear experienced bros, I tried before this WL (2-3 months back?) from 1654A. She's quite short (about 160cm or below), boobs are perky B, slim and athletic figure - she says she used to do (long distance?) running last time and her BUTT IS WOW... very 挺 can rival Latina girls ( I exaggerate abit la.. but you understand my enthusiasm right).
Anyone knows her name? |
|
|||
Re: Girls in 1654A
Quote:
|
|
|||
Re: Girls in 1654A
Used to visit An An at least once a week. Since she left, have not visited GL. Would appreciate if any bros can tell me if there is any girl in GL now with similar attributes i.e. pretty, tall, slim, fair and fun.
|
|
|||
Re: Girls in 1654A
With regard to tcss, I have to say I do enjoy some of the chit chat here with bros like korean, unfit, comm and sometimes that other guy eagles. It makes the environment here much more comfortable and happier.
Back to 1654a, while response to the newest batch remains muted (i mean there are almost no FRs so far, so you can derive from that what you will...), I would still visit this house for these five girls from the earlier batches who suit my taste in looks, body and service, etc. Not in any particular order: 1. Emily 2. Lisa 3. Apple 4. Yoyo 5. Xiaoxin Hope this helps bros who do want to visit this house but not sure who to try, etc. |
|
|||
Re: Girls in 1654A
Allow me to write a short FR on a newbie here:
Duo Duo. About 165cm good height. Slightly big-boned and not slim, but she looks good with a figure-hugging tight pink mini-dress. Round, sweet looking face, those that I will not reject although not exceptionally beautiful, long black hair, boobs are natural B+, skin color not as fair as Emily. Natural frencher, gets salty-wet during painting, and allows frenching after painting. Catbath, AR and BBBJ all very good, pressure just nice not too hard and rough, and she takes her time and effort doing it, not rush. FJ is very good feel too, took initiative to french you, hands caressing your body at the same time. In short, very good services. Good enough to be on my RTF list. GFE slightly low though, but she gives me a feeling that she is those quiet and sincere type of girl. Happy bonking bros. Quote:
__________________
'To up' List: None |
|
|||
Quote:
|
|
|||
Re: Girls in 1654A
Chill bros,
Year end festive seasons coming..... war less, bonk more Here's another FR on another newbie: Baby. Chio, tall 170cm looker. She got the HK actress Linda Chung look, slim body, nice slim waist and long legs without any trace of fat. Boobs are enhanced B+. Very nice proportionate model body. I chose her due to her looks and height. She is quite quiet when in the room, not much action before shower, just allow me to take off her bra and caress her breast. In the shower is standard rubba follow by BBBJ, quite nice BBBJ by a tall model. When on the bed, nice catbath and AR, but reluctant frencher, only got a bit of reluctant tongue from her. she reacted nicely to my return catbath and body caress to her, with soft purr and a little body squirming. However, after painting, she won't stick out her tongue to french during FJ, maybe afraid of hygiene reasons. Pussy quite tight, will use her pussy muscles to squeeze you after you cum. Overall not a bad bonk, feels like banging a model, but GFE is low, lower than Duo Duo. In a comparison, I feel that Duo Duo provides much better services.
__________________
'To up' List: None |
|
|||
Re: Girls in 1654A
how often do these fls go for checkup?
|
|
|||
Re: Girls in 1654A
Quote:
__________________
***Speak the truth and only the truth can set you free.*** |
|
|||
Re: Girls in 1654A
Yep. there are others around though, if you are in a rush and can't queue.
The latest nov-dec batches in other houses got some newbie syt, some more than one |
|
|||
Re: Girls in 1654A
Reminds me of some of the WLs who doesn't want to french me after i lick them. In my heart .....Im like...KNN, i shouldn't have lick you song song
__________________
***Speak the truth and only the truth can set you free.*** |
|
|||
Re: Girls in 1654A
Quote:
Need to book them and see them up close.
__________________
***Speak the truth and only the truth can set you free.*** |
|
|||
Re: Girls in 1654A
Haha. I see you are on the right path....
|
|
|||
Re: Girls in 1654A
Quote:
Thanks also to Rawall's FRs on Duo Duo and Baby. I did try Baby two or three weeks before. Reluctant frencher (struggled with kissing), low GFE etc. From pte msgs, heard she has improved in frenching but not able to open up. GFE still low. So it seems the taller WLs in the current batch underperformed right from the start. (I encountered very excellent ones in previous batches - in Xin Yi and Yang Yang - right from the start, but they degenerated some months later.) As BronzeGod advised, it may be prudent to stick to older reliable ones in 1654A for now. Will visit other houses to try out their newbies! |
Advert Space Available |
Bookmarks |
|
|