TCSS thread "My favourite MASSAGE girls"

[conquer]

Originally Posted by Chidorigan

As a lurker, I really appreciated javabeans thread. Maybe it can be revived in some form such as a Google doc or maybe a telegram chat group. These tools have some degree of anonymity too.

146A.—(1) A person in Singapore who, in the course of business, operates or maintains in Singapore a remote communication service that —
(a)
offers or facilitates the provision by a woman or girl to another person of sexual services in return for payment or reward; or
(b)
organises, manages or supervises the provision of sexual services referred to in paragraph (a), which may include inviting others to receive or participate in providing those services,
shall be guilty of an offence and shall be liable on conviction —
(i)
to a fine not exceeding $3,000 or to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 3 years or to both; and
(ii)
in the case of a second or subsequent conviction, to a fine not exceeding $10,000 or to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 5 years or to both.



As long as you can justify yourself from 146A.—(1)(b), please proceed.

[Eumiru]

Originally Posted by conquer

146A.—(1) A person in Singapore who, in the course of business, operates or maintains in Singapore a remote communication service that —
(a)
offers or facilitates the provision by a woman or girl to another person of sexual services in return for payment or reward; or
(b)
organises, manages or supervises the provision of sexual services referred to in paragraph (a), which may include inviting others to receive or participate in providing those services,
shall be guilty of an offence and shall be liable on conviction —
(i)
to a fine not exceeding $3,000 or to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 3 years or to both; and
(ii)
in the case of a second or subsequent conviction, to a fine not exceeding $10,000 or to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 5 years or to both.



As long as you can justify yourself from 146A.—(1)(b), please proceed.

Is "in return of payment or award" the key thing here?

As I believe bro Javabeans does not receive any payment or reward, is he still considered "organises, manages or supervises the provision of sexual services referred to in paragraph (a)"?

[sgjoey]

Originally Posted by Eumiru

Is "in return of payment or award" the key thing here?

As I believe bro Javabeans does not receive any payment or reward, is he still considered "organises, manages or supervises the provision of sexual services referred to in paragraph (a)"?

It's either (a) OR (b). Both are offences....

[zenith123456]

Originally Posted by sgjoey

It's either (a) OR (b). Both are offences....

Is compiling MRs covered by (b)? Even if in the process of compiling there was no invitation to others to procure those sexual services?

[sgjoey]

Feels rather strange for the authorities to block the links to one specific thread while allowing all the other threads to remain accessible....

[sgjoey]

Originally Posted by zenith123456

Is compiling MRs covered by (b)? Even if in the process of compiling there was no invitation to others to procure those sexual services?

It's rather vague.... posting the links could be indirectly construed as "...which may include inviting others to receive or participate in providing those services"

Still, as said, picking on one particular thread while allowing others to remain is rather strange....

[conquer]

Originally Posted by Eumiru

Is "in return of payment or award" the key thing here?

As I believe bro Javabeans does not receive any payment or reward, is he still considered "organises, manages or supervises the provision of sexual services referred to in paragraph (a)"?

That's what I think as well, but if the blueboys really want to cause us trouble (which I believe this is unlikely), we better get some answers ready to explain this is purely a volunteer work without any form of "reward" returned.

Strictly speaking, by posting a positive review encouraging other bros to visit a girl seems like violating this rule also.

[d2810]

146A.—(1) A person in Singapore who, in the course of business, operates or maintains in Singapore a remote communication service that —

Think it only pertains to the site owner only. Unless JB has interedt in Sammyboy site.

[zenith123456]

Originally Posted by conquer

That's what I think as well, but if the blueboys really want to cause us trouble (which I believe this is unlikely), we better get some answers ready to explain this is purely a volunteer work without any form of "reward" returned.

Strictly speaking, by posting a positive review encouraging other bros to visit a girl seems like violating this rule also.

Means next time we write MR must put disclaimer in small print that it does not constitute an invitation to others lol

[zenith123456]

Where are all the samsters from MinLaw, LawSoc, AGC, SPF when we need clarification? Lol

[conquer]

It is really a pity to see the gone of such an amazing thread. Appreciate the effort of all bros who have contributed to the compilation.

[Blu3]

Originally Posted by Javabeans

Hi Guys, thanks for the support. Our MDA has blocked most of the posts in the compilation thread citing it has violated the Internet Content Act.. blah blah. Therefore I have brought it down. And it is for my own safety also. It will be not fun if the AV regard me as an OKT.

Will it be up again? I have no idea...

Cheers

Bro Javabeans,

Thank you for the great compilation all this while. With your help, then we can make better decisions while hunting.

Many thanks once again and hope to see revival of any compilations in the future if there are chances.

[tim1]

Weird... Even if website is blocked.. It should be the whole sammyboy site instead of just a few ML links. Guess it's now safer to stick to regulars instead... Gonna be difficult to keep track on returning gems too.. The OKTs are gonna be so happy the thread got trashed!

Being too dependent on Javabeans's thread. Thanks for helping us save money on unworthy MLs all this time!

[stiffness]

Guys, I don't think JB is being targeted but rather, SBF is now under the banned 100 sites in Singapore. When I visit sbf via the green ISP I get this warning message now:


I'm not sure about other ISPs but it's only a matter of time before the red and other providers conform to the IMDA's commant.

If you go to the Adult discussion forum you'll see my query there and some suggestions on work around. I won't bother posting here for obvious reasons.From what I can read - ST, SH, MR all blocking SBF now.

If you can find SBF's twitter some alternatives are posted there too. It's only a matter of time before SBF gets into the 100 banned list.

[pubor76]

Originally Posted by zenith123456

Means next time we write MR must put disclaimer in small print that it does not constitute an invitation to others lol

The favourite disclaimer is "one man's meat may be another man's poison"

Truly we have become a nanny state.