Fetish/Role Play/BDSM in HC

[Tiger79]

Post deleted.

[wujifoot]

Originally Posted by Tiger79

Please don't use this forum to blackmail people and expose them publicly. There is trust in a session, and just because something happened between you and a client does not give you the right to threaten and blackmail. Please remove your post.

Not taking side here...

maybe the bro took a little further than expected.
however touching ass can be seen as a naughty behaviour in a session, rather than a molest. Of course when its public, its molest outright, but so is touching & licking foot. So depending on the social context, a lot things can be very gray.

so live and let live, also a nice gesture for the bro will be to offer an apology, and move on. Such misunderstanding can happen in life.

[sgdiscreethunk]

Originally Posted by wujifoot

Not taking side here...

maybe the bro took a little further than expected.
however touching ass can be seen as a naughty behaviour in a session, rather than a molest. Of course when its public, its molest outright, but so is touching & licking foot. So depending on the social context, a lot things can be very gray.

so live and let live, also a nice gesture for the bro will be to offer an apology, and move on. Such misunderstanding can happen in life.

I agree with the 2 comments given earlier. A lot depends on the context of the situation. In the 1st place, context is gray for such BDSM sessions. To be a little blunt, how do you qualify molest to the police when it has been done in a room with a monetary transaction being made? I guess there are many other alternative solutions for this.

[Rfootdude]

What the guy did to Lain (according to her version of events) of grabbing her butt on the way out is likely an act constituting the outrage of her modesty, or in layman terms, molest. This would be in clear contravention of section 354 of the Penal Code, which states that any such act, which the perpetrator intends to or knows it is likely to outrage the modesty of the victim, would constitute an outrage of modesty and would expose the perpetrator to jail time, caning and/or fines.

Now some of the commenters above have stated their opinions about how it may be arguable that the act in question may not have been an outrage of Lain's modesty given the context of a session. Now while it is true that the police/prosecution and/or courts may take this interpretation should the act have been committed in the middle of a session, it is clear that this act occurred after the session had lapsed and he was in the process of exiting the room. Given that Lain had not consented to allowing him to perform such an action on her, it is likely that this would be construed as an outrage of modesty.

So my advice would be to be careful when you come out to play and don't land yourself in unnecessary trouble with the law.

[totolim]

I dont think she is blackmailing. She is giving him a chance to negotiate after he he broken the trust or protocol.

I was once told by a Jap dom not to try anything funny or beyond the rules when sessioning in Japan, unless the dom consent. Some of the clubs may have links to gangs or can make things difficult if they have to

[MistressLain]

Originally Posted by totolim

I dont think she is blackmailing. She is giving him a chance to negotiate after he he broken the trust or protocol.

This is my exact intention. Since mutual contacts also were blocked I have to resort to this way to let my message reach him. My purpose is reached as he has unblocked me already, but as for how we are going to settle it quietly will depend on him.

I may be deleting the post. Depending.

[MistressLain]

Originally Posted by Tiger79

Please don't use this forum to blackmail people and expose them publicly. There is trust in a session, and just because something happened between you and a client does not give you the right to threaten and blackmail. Please remove your post.

i would remove it in due time but you quoting my post will make my deleting futile isn't it.

[Havanna Slicks]

my views on this, since i was quoted in the post...

like a few bros said within session is a grey area but best not to touch, dommes are not escorts per se, wan to touch go book FL to touch to ur heart's content,
otherwise it's gonna juz be viewed as getting some free cheap thrils and trying ur luck in getting away wif it... although i'm alwiz known for my wandering
'salty pig' hands, i alwiz ask before indulging though most of the time juz get slapped or punished... however whenever dommes hear my nick go in straightaway
handcuff or tie up so my wonderful hands didnt get put to good use... hugging after sessions is also very common, sometimes overseas dommes will even do the
face touch greeting or a small peck on the cheek, but ass groping is no no, accidental or not, hands shld be at the waist or bra strap level, not ass level... even for
dommes whom u're very familar wif (having multiple sessions) best to get explicit consent first before indulging, it might be a harmless slap on the ass, an
unintentional brush against her boobs, a innocuous slide up the thighs, in the eyes of law, all become malicious wif intent, so not worth it, dont mess wif dommes
is the best policy...

i did chat wif the said bro and mistress, in fact most bros here have chatted wif me either PM, email, whatsapp, wechat or other platforms, same goes for most
of the mistresses i met, i still keep in touch wif them, with some nice ones showering me with their love, time and attention... i made many friends in my SM
journey thus far (considering i'm quite new since nov 17)... like mistress lain said, she only took to this resort coz the bro blocked everyone including myself so she
couldnt reach out to him also, no intention of mistress to blackmail or threaten him... blackmail or threaten wont be able to get away in SG la, so no point trying,
if u been reading Dome L, there's a school teacher visiting FLs with a hidden camera, taking footage from sessions den blackmailing them, he's still at large but shld
be a matter of time before he gets fingered by the long arms of law...

[Tiger79]

Originally Posted by MistressLain

i would remove it in due time but you quoting my post will make my deleting futile isn't it.

Yes, good point. I've deleted my post with the quote.

Originally Posted by Rfootdude

What the guy did to Lain (according to her version of events) of grabbing her butt on the way out is likely an act constituting the outrage of her modesty, or in layman terms, molest. This would be in clear contravention of section 354 of the Penal Code, which states that any such act, which the perpetrator intends to or knows it is likely to outrage the modesty of the victim, would constitute an outrage of modesty and would expose the perpetrator to jail time, caning and/or fines.

Now some of the commenters above have stated their opinions about how it may be arguable that the act in question may not have been an outrage of Lain's modesty given the context of a session. Now while it is true that the police/prosecution and/or courts may take this interpretation should the act have been committed in the middle of a session, it is clear that this act occurred after the session had lapsed and he was in the process of exiting the room. Given that Lain had not consented to allowing him to perform such an action on her, it is likely that this would be construed as an outrage of modesty.

So my advice would be to be careful when you come out to play and don't land yourself in unnecessary trouble with the law.

Objection! Hearsay and incompetent!

Since when did the SBF court appoint you as public prosecutor?

You may get your rocks off dispensing whatever advice this is, but no one asked for it. Save it for your job as a lawyer, if you're one in the first place.

[Rfootdude]

Originally Posted by indecisive

Objection! Hearsay and incompetent!

Since when did the SBF court appoint you as public prosecutor?

You may get your rocks off dispensing whatever advice this is, but no one asked for it. Save it for your job as a lawyer, if you're one in the first place.

And when were you appointed moderator of this thread?

If you enjoy burying your head in the sand, feel free to add me to your ignore list. If you’re lucky maybe the police will add you to their ignore list too...?

Originally Posted by Rfootdude

And when were you appointed moderator of this thread?

If you enjoy burying your head in the sand, feel free to add me to your ignore list. If you’re lucky maybe the police will add you to their ignore list too...?

False equivalence and appeal to authority.

Looks like I overestimated you. You're probably just some sad nerd who enjoys spending time reading or googling the statute book too much.

So how much sex do you get from white knighting so much? Has any girl give you any yet?

[Rfootdude]

Originally Posted by indecisive

False equivalence and appeal to authority.

Looks like I overestimated you. You're probably just some sad nerd who enjoys spending time reading or googling the statute book too much.

So how much sex do you get from white knighting so much? Has any girl give you any yet?

Ad hominem much?

If it’s so simple that any sad nerd can Google any statutes and take a legal position, why don’t you try engaging me on the topic and sharing an alternative viewpoint for an adult, evidence-based discussion to the benefit of the forum users?

Unless, of course you don’t believe in rational intercourse. I do, because I have a lot of practice in that and most other forms of intercourse.

[mutalisk]

Let's stick to the real purpose of this forum.

Welcome mistress lain, unfortunately she was forced to come her to confront someone who broke her rules and since now that's settled, lets leave it behind and move on..

In another news.. it seems c*c* has disappeared from slg.. anyone has any updates? Hahaha

[sequence79]

Originally Posted by Goddessling

https://m.locanto.sg/singapore/ID_27...ress-ling.html

Are you from PRC?