Not sure if other bros felt the same. Just my observations.
The numbering system for looks is quite skewed.
10 - absolute beauty - the correct type for the correct bro
8-9 good and less than perfect. Hits the spot
From here it’s a large number of 7 which makes it the median average.
6 - is the MP milf perhaps or landmine
5 - some bros say is ugly but rate a 5
Below 5 - Im not sure why would any bro continue the session for those below 5 actually since it means “failing”
The range is mostly 6 to 10. That forms the norm.
I agree with your numbering system. 7 is a girl you don’t mind having as your gf and you are proud to bring her out.
__________________
Save your bullets for a better catch
There were no lies, just some harsh facts. Zap me harder if it pleases you because it hurts me badly.
Nowadays people are just content with whatever ML that came over. Pay couple of hundreds for an average looking with below average service. Write FR still need to sugarcoat because scare to be zap or blacklist. Justifying review on old fat ugly ML being great just attest your low standard. Clearly ML are their own boss to set their price and service with no okt to regulate them. Only agent who she paid to be her secretary to handle her daily issues. Being played but still trying to help them to scam more. Really sillypore. Small head cannot control after covid years of substandard. Keeping the pond polluted with more dead fishes. Talk about young man being harsh for truth when old seasoned warrior should be upholding even higher standard but now is the other way round. This chinese scene has been a joke for a while now.
Yesterday had my session with her last evening. Whole body aching and need a good and powerful run on my back. She provided very well balance strength in relaxing the muscle.Massage well done.
Sensual is the must.Die die must try the wonderful chair she has. It gives both party joy and fun. Seating of the chair, performing “fake” love making indeed drives the mind high. This chair good for both and depend who seat on it.
Bro do you have an approx age for Doris? Under 45?
You're being absolutely delusional. The words I used are not toxic at all. Let us try to find better alternative adjectives that are less "toxic" as you described.
"Fat"- this is a neutral objective term. It is simply a descriptive term with no negative connotations. Fat means fat, how else you want to phrase it? "She weighs on the heavier ends of the scale". You think this is shakespeare?
"Landmine" - This is one of the most astute and perfect words to describe ladies who post good pics but are fugly irl. In fact, I cant think of a better word. "She was a terrifying revelation" Like that suit you better?
"Ugly" - very offensive ah? Ok sorry, next time i will say " She was truly a terror to behold"
"Lao auntie" - when u visit cny as a young kid you dont say "Happy new year auntie" meh?. Old is offensive? Ok, next time i will say " She was a lady past her prime, her looks faded since years past"
Other bros, please let me know if my language is unacceptable. Never knew this was a forum for intellectual gentlemen. I will make it a point to use more elegant sophistries in the future.
I think it is unacceptable, can accept my opinion of it?
NO one think you are not entitled to your own opinion and standard. It is your standard, keep it to yourself.
Whatever language you use to describe the MLs, you are entitled to it. Bros here choose whether to believe your reviews. Can have that freedom?
As you said, this forum free to speak, so can accept bros ranting and disagreeing with you?
You said 99 is bah bah etc, but I think she is pretty slim and looks very fine. Can accept my low standard? Or does my low standard stop you from visiting the girls? No diff right whatever standards bros put out here?
You gave an example of your standard by presenting Xiao Xue. Please see who were the first few to write a review on her. Aku. In comparison I will RTM 99 more, but can you accept my standard? Did I impose my standard on you?
You started ranting back when bros disagree with your comments, then why start when you are not acceptable of others' standards.
Some bros here are trying to define standards and what it means for each point. Honestly, it is pointless. What a 7 means to you means nothing to me or someone else, just a 'at least looks didn't fail YOUR standard'. It is just a gauge.
Pay a visit and was not disappointed.
Look: Not a syt but more of a GND. Wun reject and grows on u.
Boobs: Nice and firm big B small C with light color nips
Body: Petite, smooth skin
Massage: NA, not really for that purpose
Services: accommodating, very likable personality, skillful with her hand, soft moan surround sound.
Overall: Recommend to try , not going to be here for long.
I think it is unacceptable, can accept my opinion of it?
NO one think you are not entitled to your own opinion and standard. It is your standard, keep it to yourself.
Whatever language you use to describe the MLs, you are entitled to it. Bros here choose whether to believe your reviews. Can have that freedom?
As you said, this forum free to speak, so can accept bros ranting and disagreeing with you?
You said 99 is bah bah etc, but I think she is pretty slim and looks very fine. Can accept my low standard? Or does my low standard stop you from visiting the girls? No diff right whatever standards bros put out here?
You gave an example of your standard by presenting Xiao Xue. Please see who were the first few to write a review on her. Aku. In comparison I will RTM 99 more, but can you accept my standard? Did I impose my standard on you?
You started ranting back when bros disagree with your comments, then why start when you are not acceptable of others' standards.
Some bros here are trying to define standards and what it means for each point. Honestly, it is pointless. What a 7 means to you means nothing to me or someone else, just a 'at least looks didn't fail YOUR standard'. It is just a gauge.
Yes, you are free to think that my language is unacceptable. If so, do come up with better alternative adjectives like what i did. Let me know how i can improve my language by providing constructive criticism.
Also, everyone is entitled to their own opinions- I never said otherwise. Put it this way, in the past, 99% of people believed that the earth was flat. Are they allowed to have such an opinion? Sure. Today, 99% of all reviews give ratings of 7 and above. Are they allowed to have such an opinion? Of course. But im part of the 1% that thinks people have astonishingly low standards.
Yes, everyone can have their own opinions, so lets draw the line and agree to disagree.
However, i do believe my use of language is completely fine. Please do point out how "fat", "old" , "auntie" are offensive. I want to hear your opinion.
I agree with your numbering system. 7 is a girl you don’t mind having as your gf and you are proud to bring her out.
actually u read the FR long enough hor u noe the bro here are being nice lah lol. 7 is the magic number lah. u neither do u give ppl high expectation nor offend any of the ml supporter. so it is for ML above average look to chio.
anything below 7 mean go at your own risk.
Anything above 7 with a few FR from seasonal bro mean this one really chio hahhaha. they willing to vouch for her to give high score.
Nowadays people are just content with whatever ML that came over. Pay couple of hundreds for an average looking with below average service. Write FR still need to sugarcoat because scare to be zap or blacklist. Justifying review on old fat ugly ML being great just attest your low standard. Clearly ML are their own boss to set their price and service with no okt to regulate them. Only agent who she paid to be her secretary to handle her daily issues. Being played but still trying to help them to scam more. Really sillypore. Small head cannot control after covid years of substandard. Keeping the pond polluted with more dead fishes. Talk about young man being harsh for truth when old seasoned warrior should be upholding even higher standard but now is the other way round. This chinese scene has been a joke for a while now.
The joke is on those who thinks it’s a joke and yet still read the thread, chiong the scene and post their nonsense comments. If you think you or even those who are critical of the current scene are powerful enough to shake up the industry, then good luck to your daydreams. Nothing is perfect in this world
It also depends on the population of the distribution curve.
If the population consists of all the women in this world including celebrities such as Cecilia Cheung or Vivian chow, then of course these MLs wouldn't make it beyond 7. Rarely will find a 6.5 - probably once every blue moon. Guess some bros here have this mindset.
If the population is just restricted to the current batch of MLs (excluding those have RTC) then 99 & tutu probably will be a 8, love probably @8.5 and kiki will be a 9.
nonetheless please be reminded that look is subjective.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mobile88
Not sure if other bros felt the same. Just my observations.
The numbering system for looks is quite skewed.
10 - absolute beauty - the correct type for the correct bro
8-9 good and less than perfect. Hits the spot
From here it’s a large number of 7 which makes it the median average.
6 - is the MP milf perhaps or landmine
5 - some bros say is ugly but rate a 5
Below 5 - Im not sure why would any bro continue the session for those below 5 actually since it means “failing”
The range is mostly 6 to 10. That forms the norm.
Last edited by steelaeroplane; 20-02-2023 at 10:41 PM.
In terms of looks, she is probably not someone that will turn my head on the streets but felt that she looked better in person than the pictures she have on the ad. What piqued my curiosity was her interesting HDLY mentioned in some of the previous MRs which is an interesting combination of her washing my nether regions with warm water, stroking my dick, BJ and a finger up the ass (she asked permission ). That HDLY felt much better than the HJ I received when I flipped over. She doesn't seem to have much restriction in terms of roaming and that helped with the climax at the end.
She has a youthful demeanor about her, conversational and packs a punch in her massage. Location is as per her ad and convenient for foot soldiers. She is service oriented and definitely not a time watcher as I left on the hour mark. High likelihood for RTM if I'm in the area though now there are really a lot of girls listed to try. Hope this MR was useful
In terms of looks, she is probably not someone that will turn my head on the streets but felt that she looked better in person than the pictures she have on the ad. What piqued my curiosity was her interesting HDLY mentioned in some of the previous MRs which is an interesting combination of her washing my nether regions with warm water, stroking my dick, BJ and a finger up the ass (she asked permission ). That HDLY felt much better than the HJ I received when I flipped over. She doesn't seem to have much restriction in terms of roaming and that helped with the climax at the end.
She offers SM. She used to post images of such nature on WC.
I tried her some years back, when she did not have SM on her menu. Ok, nothing memorable though.
20-02-2023, 06:36 PM
). That HDLY felt much better than the HJ I received when I flipped over. She doesn't seem to have much restriction in terms of roaming and that helped with the climax at the end. 
t Similar Threads
