Sammyboy RSS Feed
29-05-2014, 03:20 AM
An honorable member of the Coffee Shop Has Just Posted the Following:
Don't understand why they always have such silly ideas about dividing the population along income brackets....always.
This is the type of sub-standard calibre we get through back-door GRC scheme.
Let me break it down for Dr Intan. What makes you think that lowering the minimum sum based on income is the right thing to do? For example, one can be earning $2,500 for some years, $10,000 for some years, unemployed for some years and then last drawn before age 55 is $1,500 and perhaps last few years before age 55 is unemployed.
So, how do you consider the minimum sum for this person?
In the first place, it is unlawful to break the promise of returning the CPF when one reaches age 55. Get this into your head first, or else nothing to debate anymore.
So, why all these twists and turns? We're voting such sub-calibre MPs into parliament to jam up the parliament system by suggesting hare-brain solutions that also totally missed the point.
The debate should be: Why govt is not returning the CPF to members at age 55, as promised originally
.......and not giving hare-brain solutions that never go through their brains at all. What the.......
http://i.imgur.com/DXUU8yu.png
Click here to view the whole thread at www.sammyboy.com (http://sammyboy.com/showthread.php?182704-PAP-Dr-Intan-missing-the-point-about-CPF-totally&goto=newpost).
Don't understand why they always have such silly ideas about dividing the population along income brackets....always.
This is the type of sub-standard calibre we get through back-door GRC scheme.
Let me break it down for Dr Intan. What makes you think that lowering the minimum sum based on income is the right thing to do? For example, one can be earning $2,500 for some years, $10,000 for some years, unemployed for some years and then last drawn before age 55 is $1,500 and perhaps last few years before age 55 is unemployed.
So, how do you consider the minimum sum for this person?
In the first place, it is unlawful to break the promise of returning the CPF when one reaches age 55. Get this into your head first, or else nothing to debate anymore.
So, why all these twists and turns? We're voting such sub-calibre MPs into parliament to jam up the parliament system by suggesting hare-brain solutions that also totally missed the point.
The debate should be: Why govt is not returning the CPF to members at age 55, as promised originally
.......and not giving hare-brain solutions that never go through their brains at all. What the.......
http://i.imgur.com/DXUU8yu.png
Click here to view the whole thread at www.sammyboy.com (http://sammyboy.com/showthread.php?182704-PAP-Dr-Intan-missing-the-point-about-CPF-totally&goto=newpost).